"The long awaited guidelines regarding the patentability of software inventions in Israel have finally been published by the Israel Patent Authority.After the list of allowed inventions are by several examples of what is patentable.
In brief, it appears that the term ‘industrial application’ as required by section 3 of the Israel Patent Law 1967 may be fulfilled by patents in any field of technology."
News and web sites about software patents around the world.
Editorial policy is to report the views of both sides without any editorial comment or slant.
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Software patents in Israel
Michael Factor writes in his blog The IP Factor:
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
And this is why Apple doesn't want to settle Android patent lawsuits | ZDNet
Deutsche Bank’s Chris Whitmore believes that a settlement would give Apple some $10 in revenue for each Android device sold, equating to some $35 to Apple’s share price. However, if Apple was able to capture 25% of Android future growth through halting distribution and forcing feature removal, that could be worth some $300 per extra handset sold, or a whopping $261 on top of Apple’s already buoyant share price.
Monday, January 09, 2012
Position of Software Patents in UK
The Law Information Portal of India has published this article on the main patent law in the UK, the Patent Act, 1977, and decisions regarding patentability of software under this law and the European convention on patents. The essay seems to be written as a background briefing for the benefit of non-UK lawyers. Read more
Saturday, January 07, 2012
Infographic: The Problem With Patents
The Frugal Dad blog posted this infographic on software patents it discusses some facts of the patent industry and how it’s changed as software, technology, and the internet have developed.
Judge rules on contested evidence in Oracle-Google case
CIO Magazine is reporting that in a preliminary ruling before the Java IP trial, significant evidence both sides attempted to introduce has been ruled eitherr admisable or inadmissible.
Oracle and Google have both won and lost in a number of their efforts to keep evidence out of the upcoming trial in Oracle's lawsuit against Google over the Android mobile OS. At issue is whether Google has infringed on Oracle's intellectual property rights by using Java without properly licensing it.
I can only assume the witnesses will be required to swear "I promise to tell the such parts of truth as judge permits and nothing like the truth."
Labels:
Android,
Facebook,
Google,
Litigation,
Open Source,
Oracle
Thursday, January 05, 2012
Microsoft patent on PVR Functions in Game Console
It completely eludes me how this isn't prior art. Microsoft's Xbox is a PC and PCs have been able to record digital video in the background for a long long time. Myth TV comes to mind.
A digital video recorder (DVR) application running alongside a television client component allows users to record media content on the gaming console. The DVR application also integrates itself with the console menu. Once integrated, users can record media content while playing games. Alternatively, users can record content when the gaming console is turned off.
Tuesday, January 03, 2012
Canadian Patent Office Allows Amazon.com’s “one-click” Patent
The issuance of the “one-click” patent may be just what Amazon.com and the [Canadian] Patent office wanted. However, for members of the public who wanted the law related to business method and software patents clarified, it is a missed opportunity to have the Supreme Court weigh in on this critically important issue.
If you think software patents are bad enough.
Software patents are not the worst thing imaginable.
You've mentioned "one-click patent" - but it's not software patent, it's UI patent. UI patents are worse then software patents: where software patents are "useful in theory but not in practice" these (as well as business patents) are unconditionally evil.
They give no disclosure gain at all (because by necessity they are disclosed when they are actually used ..
You've mentioned "one-click patent" - but it's not software patent, it's UI patent. UI patents are worse then software patents: where software patents are "useful in theory but not in practice" these (as well as business patents) are unconditionally evil.
They give no disclosure gain at all (because by necessity they are disclosed when they are actually used ..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)