"[John Oliver's] reporting posited the idea that the Innovation Act, H.R. 9, working its way through the House of Representatives, would solve most of the problems he identified in our patent system. Far from providing the solutions its proponents claim, that legislation would do little or nothing to limit the sending of bogus demand letters to unsophisticated targets in hopes of extracting nuisance value settlements – a practice that many decry as the most egregious example of patent abuse. Further, Mr. Oliver seems unaware that the last several years have seen judicial action and legislation that address the costs of patent litigation and the vagueness of software patents. Whether these measures are sufficient without additional legislation is up for debate, but John Oliver’s hypothesis is weakened by his reliance on outdated and largely irrelevant facts and data"
News and web sites about software patents around the world.
Editorial policy is to report the views of both sides without any editorial comment or slant.
Saturday, May 02, 2015
Last Week Tonight’ Host Ignores the Last Three Years of US Patent Reform
In another rebuttal of John Oliver's piece on problems with the US patent system, Michael T. Renaud posted:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment